Monday, July 19, 2010
Administrative Note
Just a quick process note: I've disabled anonymous commenting. Your opinions are welcome here, but please be prepared to stand behind them.
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Shame shame
How do you shame a bully?
Last week I came across a new Portland blog, and I've been trying to figure out how to address it ever since. Monument Square Has Eyes the new-ish (since February of this year) blog of a person whose office overlooks Monument Square. "Brusox" snaps photos of people and happenings in the square and, for the most part, snarks about them.
The thing that bothers me isn't that s/he posts pictures of unsuspecting people online: they're in a public place, and it's therefore legal to take photos of them. Unethical maybe, but legal. Although I suppose if you see a photo of yourself and/or libelous remarks on the blog and want Brusox to remove it, you would be within your rights to ask.
Now y'all know I'm not opposed to a little snark. I appreciate clever, cynical commentary, especially when it's directed at people who have social power and have chosen to live their lives in the public eye. Ahem.
But:
1. Brusox's commentary isn't especially clever, so it comes off as mean rather than funny.
2. The focus of the blog tends to be mocking the severely mentally ill people in and around the Square. They clearly can't help themselves, which makes the commentary about them not humor, but just bullying.
I suspect there isn't any good way to address this. The writer of the blog is totally within his/her rights to post on whatever they see fit, and if they think this stuff is funny I'm sure there isn't anything I can say that will change their mind. In fact, the bullying behavior demonstrated on the blog makes me a little afraid to post my thoughts, because I don't especially want that focus on me.
But more importantly, I know that there are folks being targeted on that site who can't defend themselves, and that really pisses me off. What do you think? What's the best way to address this behavior?
Last week I came across a new Portland blog, and I've been trying to figure out how to address it ever since. Monument Square Has Eyes the new-ish (since February of this year) blog of a person whose office overlooks Monument Square. "Brusox" snaps photos of people and happenings in the square and, for the most part, snarks about them.
The thing that bothers me isn't that s/he posts pictures of unsuspecting people online: they're in a public place, and it's therefore legal to take photos of them. Unethical maybe, but legal. Although I suppose if you see a photo of yourself and/or libelous remarks on the blog and want Brusox to remove it, you would be within your rights to ask.
Now y'all know I'm not opposed to a little snark. I appreciate clever, cynical commentary, especially when it's directed at people who have social power and have chosen to live their lives in the public eye. Ahem.
But:
1. Brusox's commentary isn't especially clever, so it comes off as mean rather than funny.
2. The focus of the blog tends to be mocking the severely mentally ill people in and around the Square. They clearly can't help themselves, which makes the commentary about them not humor, but just bullying.
I suspect there isn't any good way to address this. The writer of the blog is totally within his/her rights to post on whatever they see fit, and if they think this stuff is funny I'm sure there isn't anything I can say that will change their mind. In fact, the bullying behavior demonstrated on the blog makes me a little afraid to post my thoughts, because I don't especially want that focus on me.
But more importantly, I know that there are folks being targeted on that site who can't defend themselves, and that really pisses me off. What do you think? What's the best way to address this behavior?
Tuesday, July 06, 2010
Killah
She preys on innocent victims, waiting for them in the shadow of an alley, crouching under the stairs, lying flat beneath a car with a handful of knives. Unaware, they walk about their silly nighttime business until she decides they've had enough; with the stone hand of an angel she reaches out and snuffs their small dreams. But death is not enough for this yellow-eyed beauty. She desires their screams, thrills in their delusions of escape. She'll toy with them until they are exhausted and wild-eyed, and snap their necks with a casual smack. Then, with the wind tickling her ears, she'll drag her victim to the backyard, to display the gruesome work to her tall gods.
But they are indifferent to her bloody gifts. Each new body is disappeared into a silent grave, with no acknowledgement of her effort. She decides to go for larger prey. Perhaps the tall ones require more flesh.
Friday, July 02, 2010
Promo
I also blog at work. Just FYI.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Labels
- bollard (4)
- celiac (6)
- Disclosure (34)
- Environment (9)
- Everyday Politics (101)
- Family (47)
- Food (26)
- haha (7)
- lesbian radio (8)
- Meta (29)
- Momming (41)
- Obsessions (123)
- ov (1)
- Poverty (13)
- Promo (6)
- Queer (24)
- Random (114)
- stonecoast (16)
- Tech (10)
- TEOTWAWKI (3)
- Vacation (10)
- work (6)
- Writing (49)
- yarncraft (4)